CMS performance

How the most-used CMS platforms perform on real-user Core Web Vitals data.

Field data PhoneDesktopAll Scope All sites Q1 2026 edition · Phone field outcomes
Metric LCP INP CLS
1

At a glance the headline numbers for CMS performance

How the most-used CMS platforms perform on real-user Core Web Vitals data.

7
CMSs ranked
After min-sites filter
41,986
Sites in sample
Combined across all items
0.00
Best CLS (p75)
Wix
The State of Web Vitals · Q1 2026 · 94,910 sites · phone field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
2

The ranking sorted by CLS at p75, fastest first

# CMS CLS p75 Passing Sites
1 Wix 0.00 97.5%
2,688
2 Joomla 0.00 91.9%
1,224
3 Shopify 0.01 94.4%
4,047
4 WordPress 0.01 90.2%
30,809
5 Drupal 0.02 90.3%
1,641
6 Squarespace 0.03 89.7%
1,012
7 Adobe Commerce 0.08 79.7%
565
The State of Web Vitals · Q1 2026 · 94,910 sites · phone field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
3

Passing CLS per CMS which group passes the CLS most often

CMSSitesPassing CLSp75
Wix 2.8% 2,688 98% 0.00
Shopify 4.3% 4,047 94% 0.01
TYPO3 0.1% 48 94% 0.01
Ghost 0% 22 93% 0.00
Joomla 1.3% 1,224 92% 0.00
Drupal 1.7% 1,641 90% 0.02
WordPress 32.5% 30,809 90% 0.01
Squarespace 1.1% 1,012 90% 0.03
Adobe Commerce 0.6% 565 80% 0.08
Storyblok 0% 5 60% 0.14
Good Needs Improvement Poor Sorted best-passing first · median colored by its own rating · pass = good CLS (0.1 at p75) · one value per site

98% of Wix sites pass CLS. Adobe Commerce trails 18 points behind. computed

The State of Web Vitals · Q1 2026 · 94,910 sites · phone field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
4

All five vitals at once the whole category without toggling - cell is the pass rate, small number the p75

LCP
INP
CLS
FCP
TTFB
WordPress 32.5%
702.7s
97119ms
900.01
592.3s
321.8s
Shopify 4.3%
951.7s
94138ms
940.01
951.2s
96537ms
Wix 2.8%
941.6s
9696ms
980.00
931.1s
85601ms
Drupal 1.7%
901.8s
94125ms
900.02
851.5s
66966ms
Joomla 1.3%
872.0s
94102ms
920.00
791.7s
551.1s
Squarespace 1.1%
862.1s
99105ms
900.03
841.6s
92587ms
Adobe Commerce 0.6%
772.4s
97137ms
800.08
682.0s
311.5s
TYPO3 0.1%
971.7s
90112ms
940.01
891.3s
72847ms
Ghost 0%
1001.5s
8388ms
930.00
1001.2s
75699ms
Storyblok 0%
603.2s
67174ms
600.14
801.7s
501.1s
60%95%+ passing Cell: pass rate, small number = p75 · faded rows: under 100 sites

One row per CMS, one column per vital - the cell is the share of sites passing, the small number the p75. No toggling needed to see where the category actually differs.

Wix leads on CLS: 98% of its sites pass. Adobe Commerce trails at 80%. computed

The State of Web Vitals · Q1 2026 · 94,910 sites · phone field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
5

Why this matters for the Core Web Vitals, and where to start fixing it

The CMS decides a lot about your Core Web Vitals before you write a line of your own code. It controls the HTML that ships, the scripts and styles that load by default, and how images are handled. Two sites on the same platform can score very differently depending on the theme and plugins, but the platform sets the starting point and the ceiling for how much you can tune.

Start with what the platform loads that you do not need. Strip the default scripts and styles that come with themes and plugins, defer the JavaScript that is not needed for the first paint, and make sure images go out in modern formats at the right size. On script-heavy platforms the biggest wins are usually in cutting and deferring what loads on every page.

How does your CMS affect Core Web Vitals?

Among the most-used CMS platforms, Wix reaches a good CLS on 97.5% of sites; Adobe Commerce on 79.7%.

Related signals CDN (7) → Frameworks (11) → Chrome field data from 94,910 sites, representing millions of real page loads · How we measured