CMS performance

How the most-used CMS platforms perform on real-user Core Web Vitals data.

Field data PhoneDesktopAll Scope All sites Q2 2026 edition · Phone field outcomes
Metric LCP INP CLS FCP TTFB
1

At a glance the headline numbers for CMS performance

How the most-used CMS platforms perform on real-user Core Web Vitals data.

97.3%
Best: Wix
good CLS
90.3%
Most used: WordPress
good CLS
78.9%
Worst: Adobe Commerce
good CLS

Wix passes CLS most often of any CMS. 97.3% of its sites pass. Adobe Commerce passes least at 78.9%. WordPress (the most-used CMS) sits at 90.3%. The gap is 18 percentage points.

The State of Web Vitals · Q2 2026 · 189,915 sites · phone field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
2

The ranking sorted by CLS at p75, fastest first

# CMS CLS p75 Passing Sites
1 Wix 0.00 97.3%
5,212
2 Joomla 0.00 92.7%
2,329
3 TYPO3 0.01 95.5%
95
4 Shopify 0.01 93.8%
7,616
5 WordPress 0.01 90.3%
58,969
6 Squarespace 0.02 91.1%
2,029
7 Drupal 0.02 90.9%
3,046
8 Adobe Commerce 0.08 78.9%
988
The State of Web Vitals · Q2 2026 · 189,915 sites · phone field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
3

Passing CLS per CMS which group passes the CLS most often

CMSSitesPassing CLSp75
Webflow 0% 15 100% 0.00
Wix 2.7% 5,212 97% 0.00
TYPO3 0.1% 95 96% 0.01
Shopify 4% 7,616 94% 0.01
Joomla 1.2% 2,329 93% 0.00
Squarespace 1.1% 2,029 91% 0.02
Drupal 1.6% 3,046 91% 0.02
WordPress 31.1% 58,969 90% 0.01
Ghost 0% 42 88% 0.07
Adobe Commerce 0.5% 988 79% 0.08
Other / custom 0% 16 67% 0.14
Good Needs Improvement Poor Sorted best-passing first · median colored by its own rating · pass = good CLS (0.1 at p75) · one value per site

97% of Wix sites pass CLS. Adobe Commerce trails 18 points behind. computed

The State of Web Vitals · Q2 2026 · 189,915 sites · phone field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
4

All five vitals at once the whole category without toggling - cell is the pass rate, small number the p75

LCP
INP
CLS
FCP
TTFB
WordPress 31.1%
702.7s
97118ms
900.01
582.3s
321.8s
Shopify 4%
951.7s
94138ms
940.01
951.2s
96526ms
Wix 2.7%
941.6s
9696ms
970.00
941.1s
85591ms
Drupal 1.6%
901.9s
94127ms
910.02
821.6s
65971ms
Joomla 1.2%
882.0s
95104ms
930.00
791.7s
541.1s
Squarespace 1.1%
862.2s
99105ms
910.02
821.6s
93578ms
Adobe Commerce 0.5%
772.4s
95137ms
790.08
662.1s
301.6s
TYPO3 0.1%
961.5s
88108ms
960.01
901.3s
71886ms
Ghost 0%
961.5s
92104ms
880.07
961.2s
82644ms
Other / custom 0%
732.5s
91147ms
670.14
801.6s
43938ms
Webflow 0%
1001.7s
100104ms
1000.00
1001.1s
86620ms
60%95%+ passing Cell: pass rate, small number = p75 · faded rows: under 100 sites

One row per CMS, one column per vital - the cell is the share of sites passing, the small number the p75. No toggling needed to see where the category actually differs.

Wix leads on CLS: 97% of its sites pass. Adobe Commerce trails at 79%. computed

The State of Web Vitals · Q2 2026 · 189,915 sites · phone field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
5

Why this matters for the Core Web Vitals, and where to start fixing it

The CMS decides a lot about your Core Web Vitals before you write a line of your own code. It controls the HTML that ships, the scripts and styles that load by default, and how images are handled. Two sites on the same platform can score very differently depending on the theme and plugins, but the platform sets the starting point and the ceiling for how much you can tune.

Start with what the platform loads that you do not need. Strip the default scripts and styles that come with themes and plugins, defer the JavaScript that is not needed for the first paint, and make sure images go out in modern formats at the right size. On script-heavy platforms the biggest wins are usually in cutting and deferring what loads on every page.

How does your CMS affect Core Web Vitals?

Among the most-used CMS platforms, Wix reaches a good CLS on 97.3% of sites; Adobe Commerce on 78.9%.

Related signals CDN (7) → Frameworks (11) → Chrome field data from 189,915 sites, representing millions of real page loads · How we measured