CDN impact
Time to first byte by CDN provider, measured in real-user Chrome data.
1
At a glance the headline numbers for CDN impact
Time to first byte by CDN provider, measured in real-user Chrome data.
15
Providers ranked
After min-sites filter
310,278
Sites in sample
Combined across all items
729ms
Best TTFB (p75)
Vercel Edge
The State of Web Vitals · Q2 2026 · 189,915 sites · phone field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
2
The ranking sorted by TTFB at p75, fastest first
| # | Provider | TTFB p75 | Passing | Sites | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Vercel Edge | 729ms | 77.9% | 2,717 | |
| 2 | KeyCDN | 842ms | 73.5% | 1,168 | |
| 3 | Google Cloud CDN | 866ms | 72.1% | 30,748 | |
| 4 | Azure CDN | 889ms | 72.3% | 394 | |
| 5 | Imperva/Incapsula | 980ms | 64.6% | 473 | |
| 6 | Fastly | 1.1s | 61.1% | 80,918 | |
| 7 | jsDelivr | 1.1s | 60.5% | 13,065 | |
| 8 | CloudFront | 1.1s | 60.5% | 50,794 | |
| 9 | Netlify Edge | 1.1s | 52.8% | 1,025 | |
| 10 | Bunny CDN | 1.2s | 59.1% | 17,219 | |
| 11 | Cloudflare | 1.2s | 59.2% | 81,609 | |
| 12 | Akamai | 1.2s | 55.6% | 7,352 | |
| 13 | cdnjs | 1.2s | 59.5% | 17,025 | |
| 14 | unpkg | 1.3s | 52.7% | 5,586 | |
| 15 | Sucuri | 1.7s | 36.0% | 185 |
The State of Web Vitals · Q2 2026 · 189,915 sites · phone field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
3
Passing TTFB per CDN which group passes the TTFB most often
CDNSitesPassing TTFBp75
Vercel Edge 1.4%
2,717
729ms
KeyCDN 0.6%
1,168
842ms
Azure CDN 0.2%
394
889ms
Google Cloud CDN 16.2%
30,748
866ms
Imperva/Incapsula 0.2%
473
980ms
Fastly 42.6%
80,918
1.1s
CloudFront 26.7%
50,794
1.1s
jsDelivr 6.9%
13,065
1.1s
cdnjs 9%
17,025
1.2s
Cloudflare 43%
81,609
1.2s
Bunny CDN 9.1%
17,219
1.2s
Akamai 3.9%
7,352
1.2s
Netlify Edge 0.5%
1,025
1.1s
unpkg 2.9%
5,586
1.3s
Sucuri 0.1%
185
1.7s
Good
Needs Improvement
Poor
Sorted best-passing first · median colored by its own rating · pass = good TTFB (800ms at p75) · one value per site
78% of Vercel Edge sites pass TTFB. Sucuri trails 42 points behind, leaving 64% of its sites failing. computed
The State of Web Vitals · Q2 2026 · 189,915 sites · phone field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
4
All five vitals at once the whole category without toggling - cell is the pass rate, small number the p75
LCP
INP
CLS
FCP
TTFB
Cloudflare 43%
802.3s
91137ms
870.03
741.8s
591.2s
Fastly 42.6%
812.3s
91139ms
860.03
761.8s
611.1s
CloudFront 26.7%
802.3s
90145ms
850.04
751.8s
611.1s
Google Cloud CDN 16.2%
842.1s
91144ms
880.03
811.6s
72866ms
Bunny CDN 9.1%
812.2s
93133ms
880.03
751.8s
591.2s
cdnjs 9%
802.3s
93131ms
870.03
741.8s
601.2s
jsDelivr 6.9%
812.2s
92137ms
870.03
751.8s
611.1s
Akamai 3.9%
792.3s
92137ms
860.03
751.8s
561.2s
unpkg 2.9%
742.5s
90144ms
850.04
672.1s
531.3s
Vercel Edge 1.4%
782.4s
85165ms
840.04
761.8s
78729ms
KeyCDN 0.6%
872.0s
91148ms
890.04
841.6s
74842ms
Netlify Edge 0.5%
722.6s
78187ms
740.12
731.9s
531.1s
Imperva/Incapsula 0.2%
772.4s
83170ms
810.08
721.9s
65980ms
Azure CDN 0.2%
822.2s
84154ms
820.08
791.7s
72889ms
Sucuri 0.1%
682.7s
96136ms
830.06
582.3s
361.7s
60%95%+ passing
Cell: pass rate, small number = p75 · faded rows: under 100 sites
One row per CDN, one column per vital - the cell is the share of sites passing, the small number the p75. No toggling needed to see where the category actually differs.
Vercel Edge leads on TTFB: 78% of its sites pass. Sucuri trails at 36%. computed
The State of Web Vitals · Q2 2026 · 189,915 sites · phone field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
Want the polished comparison? View as a share-anchored page →
Related signals
Marketing pixels (10) →
Bot detection (7) →
Forms (4) →
Personalization (5) →
Chrome field data from 189,915 sites, representing millions of real page loads · How we measured
Chrome field data from 189,915 sites, representing millions of real page loads. How we measured.