CMS performance

How the most-used CMS platforms perform on real-user Core Web Vitals data.

Field data PhoneDesktopAll Scope All sites Q1 2026 edition · All devices field outcomes
Metric LCP INP CLS
1

At a glance the headline numbers for CMS performance

How the most-used CMS platforms perform on real-user Core Web Vitals data.

7
CMSs ranked
After min-sites filter
41,986
Sites in sample
Combined across all items
0.00
Best CLS (p75)
Wix
The State of Web Vitals · Q1 2026 · 94,910 sites · all devices field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
2

The ranking sorted by CLS at p75, fastest first

# CMS CLS p75 Passing Sites
1 Wix 0.00 97.7%
2,688
2 Joomla 0.01 91.2%
1,224
3 Shopify 0.02 94.3%
4,047
4 WordPress 0.03 88.9%
30,809
5 Drupal 0.04 88.4%
1,641
6 Squarespace 0.05 89.1%
1,012
7 Adobe Commerce 0.11 73.7%
565
The State of Web Vitals · Q1 2026 · 94,910 sites · all devices field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
3

Passing CLS per CMS which group passes the CLS most often

CMSSitesPassing CLSp75
Wix 2.8% 2,688 98% 0.00
Ghost 0% 22 96% 0.06
Shopify 4.3% 4,047 94% 0.02
TYPO3 0.1% 48 92% 0.02
Joomla 1.3% 1,224 91% 0.01
Squarespace 1.1% 1,012 89% 0.05
WordPress 32.5% 30,809 89% 0.03
Drupal 1.7% 1,641 88% 0.04
Adobe Commerce 0.6% 565 74% 0.11
Storyblok 0% 5 60% 0.14
Good Needs Improvement Poor Sorted best-passing first · median colored by its own rating · pass = good CLS (0.1 at p75) · one value per site

98% of Wix sites pass CLS. Adobe Commerce trails 24 points behind, leaving 26% of its sites failing. computed

The State of Web Vitals · Q1 2026 · 94,910 sites · all devices field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
4

All five vitals at once the whole category without toggling - cell is the pass rate, small number the p75

LCP
INP
CLS
FCP
TTFB
WordPress 32.5%
712.7s
98103ms
890.03
602.3s
311.8s
Shopify 4.3%
961.7s
96122ms
940.02
961.2s
96524ms
Wix 2.8%
951.6s
9788ms
980.00
931.1s
80677ms
Drupal 1.7%
921.7s
97102ms
880.04
871.4s
67936ms
Joomla 1.3%
892.0s
9594ms
910.01
811.7s
541.1s
Squarespace 1.1%
892.1s
9992ms
890.05
861.5s
96556ms
Adobe Commerce 0.6%
782.4s
99120ms
740.11
702.0s
311.5s
TYPO3 0.1%
941.6s
90104ms
920.02
871.3s
72834ms
Ghost 0%
961.4s
10086ms
960.06
961.1s
80759ms
Storyblok 0%
602.8s
67154ms
600.14
602.0s
501.0s
60%95%+ passing Cell: pass rate, small number = p75 · faded rows: under 100 sites

One row per CMS, one column per vital - the cell is the share of sites passing, the small number the p75. No toggling needed to see where the category actually differs.

Wix leads on CLS: 98% of its sites pass. Adobe Commerce trails at 74%. computed

The State of Web Vitals · Q1 2026 · 94,910 sites · all devices field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
5

Why this matters for the Core Web Vitals, and where to start fixing it

The CMS decides a lot about your Core Web Vitals before you write a line of your own code. It controls the HTML that ships, the scripts and styles that load by default, and how images are handled. Two sites on the same platform can score very differently depending on the theme and plugins, but the platform sets the starting point and the ceiling for how much you can tune.

Start with what the platform loads that you do not need. Strip the default scripts and styles that come with themes and plugins, defer the JavaScript that is not needed for the first paint, and make sure images go out in modern formats at the right size. On script-heavy platforms the biggest wins are usually in cutting and deferring what loads on every page.

How does your CMS affect Core Web Vitals?

Among the most-used CMS platforms, Wix reaches a good CLS on 97.7% of sites; Adobe Commerce on 73.7%.

Related signals CDN (7) → Frameworks (11) → Chrome field data from 94,910 sites, representing millions of real page loads · How we measured