Analytics impact

Sites running each analytics provider, ranked by their CWV.

Field data PhoneDesktopAll Scope All sites Q2 2026 edition · Phone field outcomes
Metric LCP INP CLS
1

At a glance the headline numbers for Analytics impact

Sites running each analytics provider, ranked by their CWV.

19
Providers ranked
After min-sites filter
190,113
Sites in sample
Combined across all items
108ms
Best INP (p75)
Clicky
The State of Web Vitals · Q2 2026 · 189,915 sites · phone field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
2

The ranking sorted by INP at p75, fastest first

# Provider INP p75 Passing Sites
1 Clicky 108ms 100.0%
225
2 GoatCounter 113ms 100.0%
56
3 Plausible 114ms 95.2%
2,010
4 Snowplow 126ms 93.5%
3,006
5 Fathom 127ms 95.2%
315
6 Simple Analytics 127ms 87.9%
91
7 Pirsch 134ms 96.4%
113
8 Universal Analytics 136ms 92.2%
72,426
9 Google Analytics 4 136ms 92.1%
96,650
10 Matomo 140ms 93.4%
12,391
11 Umami 140ms 88.8%
826
12 StatCounter 144ms 86.8%
308
13 AT Internet/Piano 157ms 87.0%
527
14 Mixpanel 171ms 83.8%
117
15 PostHog 177ms 80.2%
295
16 Amplitude 194ms 75.5%
169
17 Adobe Analytics 197ms 75.5%
440
18 Chartbeat 220ms 73.8%
75
19 Heap 234ms 60.8%
73
The State of Web Vitals · Q2 2026 · 189,915 sites · phone field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
3

Passing INP per provider which group passes the INP most often

ProviderSitesPassing INPp75
GoatCounter 0% 56 100% 113ms
Clicky 0.1% 225 100% 108ms
Pirsch 0.1% 113 96% 134ms
Plausible 1.1% 2,010 95% 114ms
Fathom 0.2% 315 95% 127ms
Snowplow 1.6% 3,006 94% 126ms
Matomo 6.5% 12,391 93% 140ms
Universal Analytics 38.1% 72,426 92% 136ms
Google Analytics 4 50.9% 96,650 92% 136ms
Parsely 0% 36 90% 188ms
Umami 0.4% 826 89% 140ms
Simple Analytics 0% 91 88% 127ms
AT Internet/Piano 0.3% 527 87% 157ms
StatCounter 0.2% 308 87% 144ms
Mixpanel 0.1% 117 84% 171ms
PostHog 0.2% 295 80% 177ms
Adobe Analytics 0.2% 440 76% 197ms
Amplitude 0.1% 169 76% 194ms
Chartbeat 0% 75 74% 220ms
Heap 0% 73 61% 234ms
Good Needs Improvement Poor Sorted best-passing first · median colored by its own rating · pass = good INP (200ms at p75) · one value per site

100% of Clicky sites pass INP. Amplitude trails 24 points behind. computed

The State of Web Vitals · Q2 2026 · 189,915 sites · phone field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
4

All five vitals at once the whole category without toggling - cell is the pass rate, small number the p75

LCP
INP
CLS
FCP
TTFB
Google Analytics 4 50.9%
802.3s
92136ms
870.03
731.9s
561.2s
Universal Analytics 38.1%
792.3s
92136ms
880.03
721.9s
541.3s
Matomo 6.5%
852.1s
93140ms
890.02
771.7s
601.1s
Snowplow 1.6%
861.9s
94126ms
890.01
831.5s
74816ms
Plausible 1.1%
921.7s
95114ms
930.01
871.4s
77751ms
Umami 0.4%
772.4s
89140ms
880.02
781.7s
75791ms
AT Internet/Piano 0.3%
832.2s
87157ms
860.05
801.7s
70861ms
Adobe Analytics 0.2%
692.7s
76197ms
650.18
691.9s
62993ms
Fathom 0.2%
812.2s
95127ms
890.02
741.8s
611.1s
StatCounter 0.2%
812.2s
87144ms
890.02
761.8s
581.2s
PostHog 0.2%
782.4s
80177ms
860.06
692.0s
451.3s
Clicky 0.1%
881.7s
100108ms
900.08
821.4s
71945ms
Amplitude 0.1%
772.4s
76194ms
820.08
791.7s
70927ms
Mixpanel 0.1%
712.7s
84171ms
750.10
731.8s
611.0s
Pirsch 0.1%
882.1s
96134ms
710.18
931.6s
50927ms
Simple Analytics 0%
762.3s
88127ms
880.02
702.0s
571.2s
Chartbeat 0%
941.9s
74220ms
670.12
911.5s
79599ms
Heap 0%
653.0s
61234ms
760.10
612.3s
531.2s
GoatCounter 0%
921.6s
100113ms
950.03
921.4s
84630ms
Parsely 0%
971.8s
90188ms
320.20
841.7s
65938ms
60%95%+ passing Cell: pass rate, small number = p75 · faded rows: under 100 sites

One row per provider, one column per vital - the cell is the share of sites passing, the small number the p75. No toggling needed to see where the category actually differs.

Clicky leads on INP: 100% of its sites pass. Amplitude trails at 76%. computed

The State of Web Vitals · Q2 2026 · 189,915 sites · phone field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
Related signals Marketing pixels (10) → Session recording (11) → Ad networks (9) → Reviews (8) → Chrome field data from 189,915 sites, representing millions of real page loads · How we measured