1
At a glance the headline numbers for JS libraries impact
Performance impact by framework provider.
21
Providers ranked
After min-sites filter
272,218
Sites in sample
Combined across all items
1.7s
Best LCP (p75)
Turbo/Hotwire
The State of Web Vitals · Q2 2026 · 189,915 sites · phone field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
2
The ranking sorted by LCP at p75, fastest first
| # | Provider | LCP p75 | Passing | Sites | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Turbo/Hotwire | 1.7s | 92.0% | 520 | |
| 2 | Stimulus/Hotwire | 2.0s | 87.8% | 3,021 | |
| 3 | Polyfill.io | 2.2s | 83.0% | 88 | |
| 4 | Slick Carousel | 2.3s | 80.6% | 14,369 | |
| 5 | jQuery | 2.3s | 80.1% | 129,336 | |
| 6 | Flickity | 2.3s | 80.0% | 5,509 | |
| 7 | Owl Carousel | 2.3s | 79.2% | 8,206 | |
| 8 | Next.js | 2.3s | 79.7% | 3,970 | |
| 9 | Lodash | 2.4s | 77.9% | 25,401 | |
| 10 | Lazysizes | 2.4s | 78.7% | 12,984 | |
| 11 | React | 2.4s | 77.6% | 448 | |
| 12 | Vue.js | 2.5s | 75.6% | 10,724 | |
| 13 | Moment.js | 2.5s | 75.2% | 7,670 | |
| 14 | Ember.js | 2.5s | 74.4% | 114 | |
| 15 | Lit | 2.5s | 74.4% | 10,260 | |
| 16 | Swiper | 2.6s | 73.9% | 29,806 | |
| 17 | GSAP | 2.6s | 72.2% | 4,918 | |
| 18 | Nuxt | 2.7s | 70.2% | 1,199 | |
| 19 | Backbone.js | 2.8s | 66.9% | 1,540 | |
| 20 | Angular | 3.1s | 59.2% | 1,908 | |
| 21 | Ionic | 3.9s | 42.9% | 227 |
The State of Web Vitals · Q2 2026 · 189,915 sites · phone field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
3
Passing LCP per provider which group passes the LCP most often
ProviderSitesPassing LCPp75
Polymer 0%
17
2.0s
Turbo/Hotwire 0.3%
520
1.7s
Stimulus/Hotwire 1.6%
3,021
2.0s
Polyfill.io 0%
88
2.2s
Slick Carousel 7.6%
14,369
2.3s
jQuery 68.1%
129,336
2.3s
Flickity 2.9%
5,509
2.3s
Next.js 2.1%
3,970
2.3s
Owl Carousel 4.3%
8,206
2.3s
lazysizes 6.8%
12,984
2.4s
Lodash 13.4%
25,401
2.4s
React 0.2%
448
2.4s
Vue.js 5.6%
10,724
2.5s
Moment.js 4%
7,670
2.5s
Ember.js 0.1%
114
2.5s
Lit 5.4%
10,260
2.5s
Swiper 15.7%
29,806
2.6s
GSAP 2.6%
4,918
2.6s
Nuxt.js 0.6%
1,199
2.7s
Backbone.js 0.8%
1,540
2.8s
Angular 1%
1,908
3.1s
Marko 0%
20
3.1s
Ionic 0.1%
227
3.9s
Good
Needs Improvement
Poor
Sorted best-passing first · median colored by its own rating · pass = good LCP (2.5s at p75) · one value per site
92% of Turbo/Hotwire sites pass LCP. Ionic trails 49 points behind, leaving 57% of its sites failing. computed
The State of Web Vitals · Q2 2026 · 189,915 sites · phone field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
4
All five vitals at once the whole category without toggling - cell is the pass rate, small number the p75
LCP
INP
CLS
FCP
TTFB
jQuery 68.1%
802.3s
95121ms
900.02
721.9s
521.3s
Swiper 15.7%
742.6s
94129ms
890.02
662.1s
471.5s
Lodash 13.4%
782.4s
93126ms
870.03
721.9s
601.3s
Slick Carousel 7.6%
812.3s
94128ms
870.03
741.8s
531.2s
lazysizes 6.8%
792.4s
93131ms
880.03
721.9s
521.3s
Vue.js 5.6%
762.5s
92144ms
840.04
692.0s
531.3s
Lit 5.4%
742.5s
90141ms
840.04
692.0s
561.3s
Owl Carousel 4.3%
792.3s
96120ms
840.05
731.9s
501.3s
Moment.js 4%
752.5s
91136ms
850.04
692.0s
521.4s
Flickity 2.9%
802.3s
96128ms
910.01
731.9s
571.3s
GSAP 2.6%
722.6s
97122ms
890.02
652.1s
451.6s
Next.js 2.1%
802.3s
71216ms
750.10
791.7s
70878ms
Stimulus/Hotwire 1.6%
882.0s
96121ms
920.02
841.6s
77770ms
Angular 1%
593.1s
75201ms
520.32
642.1s
79711ms
Backbone.js 0.8%
672.8s
92134ms
840.04
582.3s
401.6s
Nuxt.js 0.6%
702.7s
85172ms
720.12
691.9s
611.0s
Turbo/Hotwire 0.3%
921.7s
90161ms
950.01
861.4s
72831ms
React 0.2%
782.4s
72231ms
700.16
731.8s
461.2s
Ionic 0.1%
433.9s
82182ms
560.25
372.7s
69966ms
Ember.js 0.1%
742.5s
78161ms
740.12
722.0s
671.0s
Polyfill.io 0%
832.2s
93131ms
870.01
731.9s
631.1s
Marko 0%
583.1s
84175ms
900.10
422.9s
112.3s
Polymer 0%
1002.0s
67470ms
700.15
901.3s
80759ms
60%95%+ passing
Cell: pass rate, small number = p75 · faded rows: under 100 sites
One row per provider, one column per vital - the cell is the share of sites passing, the small number the p75. No toggling needed to see where the category actually differs.
Turbo/Hotwire leads on LCP: 92% of its sites pass. Ionic trails at 43%. computed
The State of Web Vitals · Q2 2026 · 189,915 sites · phone field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
Related signals
A/B testing (10) →
Personalization (5) →
E-commerce (14) →
CDN (15) →
Chrome field data from 189,915 sites, representing millions of real page loads · How we measured
Chrome field data from 189,915 sites, representing millions of real page loads. How we measured.