1
At a glance the headline numbers for JS libraries impact
Performance impact by framework provider.
21
Providers ranked
After min-sites filter
272,218
Sites in sample
Combined across all items
120ms
Best INP (p75)
Owl Carousel
The State of Web Vitals · Q2 2026 · 189,915 sites · phone field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
2
The ranking sorted by INP at p75, fastest first
| # | Provider | INP p75 | Passing | Sites | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Owl Carousel | 120ms | 95.8% | 8,206 | |
| 2 | jQuery | 121ms | 94.5% | 129,336 | |
| 3 | Stimulus/Hotwire | 121ms | 95.8% | 3,021 | |
| 4 | GSAP | 122ms | 96.6% | 4,918 | |
| 5 | Lodash | 126ms | 92.6% | 25,401 | |
| 6 | Flickity | 128ms | 95.7% | 5,509 | |
| 7 | Slick Carousel | 128ms | 94.3% | 14,369 | |
| 8 | Swiper | 129ms | 94.2% | 29,806 | |
| 9 | Polyfill.io | 131ms | 92.9% | 88 | |
| 10 | Lazysizes | 131ms | 93.3% | 12,984 | |
| 11 | Backbone.js | 134ms | 91.8% | 1,540 | |
| 12 | Moment.js | 136ms | 91.4% | 7,670 | |
| 13 | Lit | 141ms | 90.3% | 10,260 | |
| 14 | Vue.js | 144ms | 92.2% | 10,724 | |
| 15 | Turbo/Hotwire | 161ms | 90.4% | 520 | |
| 16 | Ember.js | 161ms | 78.3% | 114 | |
| 17 | Nuxt | 172ms | 84.8% | 1,199 | |
| 18 | Ionic | 182ms | 81.6% | 227 | |
| 19 | Angular | 201ms | 74.6% | 1,908 | |
| 20 | Next.js | 216ms | 70.9% | 3,970 | |
| 21 | React | 231ms | 71.8% | 448 |
The State of Web Vitals · Q2 2026 · 189,915 sites · phone field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
3
Passing INP per provider which group passes the INP most often
ProviderSitesPassing INPp75
GSAP 2.6%
4,918
122ms
Owl Carousel 4.3%
8,206
120ms
Stimulus/Hotwire 1.6%
3,021
121ms
Flickity 2.9%
5,509
128ms
jQuery 68.1%
129,336
121ms
Slick Carousel 7.6%
14,369
128ms
Swiper 15.7%
29,806
129ms
lazysizes 6.8%
12,984
131ms
Polyfill.io 0%
88
131ms
Lodash 13.4%
25,401
126ms
Vue.js 5.6%
10,724
144ms
Backbone.js 0.8%
1,540
134ms
Moment.js 4%
7,670
136ms
Turbo/Hotwire 0.3%
520
161ms
Lit 5.4%
10,260
141ms
Nuxt.js 0.6%
1,199
172ms
Marko 0%
20
175ms
Ionic 0.1%
227
182ms
Ember.js 0.1%
114
161ms
Angular 1%
1,908
201ms
React 0.2%
448
231ms
Next.js 2.1%
3,970
216ms
Polymer 0%
17
470ms
Good
Needs Improvement
Poor
Sorted best-passing first · median colored by its own rating · pass = good INP (200ms at p75) · one value per site
97% of GSAP sites pass INP. Next.js trails 26 points behind, leaving 29% of its sites failing. computed
The State of Web Vitals · Q2 2026 · 189,915 sites · phone field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
4
All five vitals at once the whole category without toggling - cell is the pass rate, small number the p75
LCP
INP
CLS
FCP
TTFB
jQuery 68.1%
802.3s
95121ms
900.02
721.9s
521.3s
Swiper 15.7%
742.6s
94129ms
890.02
662.1s
471.5s
Lodash 13.4%
782.4s
93126ms
870.03
721.9s
601.3s
Slick Carousel 7.6%
812.3s
94128ms
870.03
741.8s
531.2s
lazysizes 6.8%
792.4s
93131ms
880.03
721.9s
521.3s
Vue.js 5.6%
762.5s
92144ms
840.04
692.0s
531.3s
Lit 5.4%
742.5s
90141ms
840.04
692.0s
561.3s
Owl Carousel 4.3%
792.3s
96120ms
840.05
731.9s
501.3s
Moment.js 4%
752.5s
91136ms
850.04
692.0s
521.4s
Flickity 2.9%
802.3s
96128ms
910.01
731.9s
571.3s
GSAP 2.6%
722.6s
97122ms
890.02
652.1s
451.6s
Next.js 2.1%
802.3s
71216ms
750.10
791.7s
70878ms
Stimulus/Hotwire 1.6%
882.0s
96121ms
920.02
841.6s
77770ms
Angular 1%
593.1s
75201ms
520.32
642.1s
79711ms
Backbone.js 0.8%
672.8s
92134ms
840.04
582.3s
401.6s
Nuxt.js 0.6%
702.7s
85172ms
720.12
691.9s
611.0s
Turbo/Hotwire 0.3%
921.7s
90161ms
950.01
861.4s
72831ms
React 0.2%
782.4s
72231ms
700.16
731.8s
461.2s
Ionic 0.1%
433.9s
82182ms
560.25
372.7s
69966ms
Ember.js 0.1%
742.5s
78161ms
740.12
722.0s
671.0s
Polyfill.io 0%
832.2s
93131ms
870.01
731.9s
631.1s
Marko 0%
583.1s
84175ms
900.10
422.9s
112.3s
Polymer 0%
1002.0s
67470ms
700.15
901.3s
80759ms
60%95%+ passing
Cell: pass rate, small number = p75 · faded rows: under 100 sites
One row per provider, one column per vital - the cell is the share of sites passing, the small number the p75. No toggling needed to see where the category actually differs.
GSAP leads on INP: 97% of its sites pass. Next.js trails at 71%. computed
The State of Web Vitals · Q2 2026 · 189,915 sites · phone field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
Related signals
A/B testing (10) →
Personalization (5) →
E-commerce (14) →
CDN (15) →
Chrome field data from 189,915 sites, representing millions of real page loads · How we measured
Chrome field data from 189,915 sites, representing millions of real page loads. How we measured.