Document lifecycle (lab)

Lab document lifecycle: DOM interactive, DOM complete, load event.

Field data PhoneDesktopAll Scope All sites Q2 2026 edition · All devices field outcomes
Metric LCP INP CLS
1

At a glance the headline numbers for Document lifecycle (lab)

Lab document lifecycle: DOM interactive, DOM complete, load event.

384ms
DOM interactive
on the typical page
671ms
DOM complete
on the typical page
676ms
load event
on the typical page
185,146
sites measured
all-device field data

The typical page reaches DOM interactive after 384ms in the lab.

The State of Web Vitals · Q2 2026 · 189,915 sites · all devices field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
2

Distribution & median LCP site count and median LCP at each level of document lifecycle (lab) — dom interactive

0ms 1250ms 2500ms 3750ms 5000ms
2.5s
4s
0 22769 45538
0 4–8 9–17 18–35 36–73 74–151 152–311 312–642 643–1327 1328–2742 2743–5664 >p98
Good (≤2.5s) Needs improvement Poor (>4s) Site count
The State of Web Vitals · Q2 2026 · 189,915 sites · all devices field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
3

Passing LCP by document lifecycle (lab) — dom interactive which level passes the LCP most often

Document lifecycle (lab) — dom interactiveSitesPassing LCPLCP
0 583 68% 1.9s
9–17 114 84% 1.3s
18–35 1,513 83% 1.3s
36–73 7,509 87% 1.3s
74–151 23,531 91% 1.2s
152–311 45,538 91% 1.2s
312–642 45,134 88% 1.4s
643–1327 33,249 79% 1.8s
1328–2742 17,561 55% 2.4s
2743–5664 6,721 47% 2.6s
>p98 3,690 64% 2.0s
Good Needs Improvement Poor Faded rows: under 100 sites

Document lifecycle (lab) — dom interactive 384ms. p75 858ms. p99 12.4s. Spearman with LCP r = +0.40. At the low end (0ms): LCP 1.9s. At the high end (>p98): LCP 2.0s. computed

The State of Web Vitals · Q2 2026 · 189,915 sites · all devices field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
4

Distribution & median LCP site count and median LCP at each level of document lifecycle (lab) — dom complete

0ms 750ms 1500ms 2250ms 3000ms
2.5s
0 26335 52670
0 5–11 12–23 24–50 51–107 108–229 230–493 494–1059 1060–2277 2278–4893 4894–10516 >p98
Good (≤2.5s) Needs improvement Poor (>4s) Site count
The State of Web Vitals · Q2 2026 · 189,915 sites · all devices field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
5

Passing LCP by document lifecycle (lab) — dom complete which level passes the LCP most often

Document lifecycle (lab) — dom completeSitesPassing LCPLCP
0 1,449 71% 1.9s
12–23 185 85% 1.3s
24–50 1,410 84% 1.3s
51–107 4,541 89% 1.1s
108–229 17,845 92% 1.1s
230–493 44,990 92% 1.2s
494–1059 52,670 88% 1.5s
1060–2277 36,554 74% 1.9s
2278–4893 16,497 57% 2.3s
4894–10516 5,327 59% 2.2s
>p98 3,674 74% 1.7s
Good Needs Improvement Poor Faded rows: under 100 sites

Document lifecycle (lab) — dom complete 671ms. p75 1.4s. p99 24.1s. Spearman with LCP r = +0.39. At the low end (0ms): LCP 1.9s. At the high end (>p98): LCP 1.7s. computed

The State of Web Vitals · Q2 2026 · 189,915 sites · all devices field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
6

Distribution & median LCP site count and median LCP at each level of document lifecycle (lab) — load

0ms 750ms 1500ms 2250ms 3000ms
2.5s
0 26293 52586
0 5–11 12–23 24–50 51–107 108–230 231–494 495–1061 1062–2281 2282–4903 4904–10541 >p98
Good (≤2.5s) Needs improvement Poor (>4s) Site count
The State of Web Vitals · Q2 2026 · 189,915 sites · all devices field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
7

Passing LCP by document lifecycle (lab) — load which level passes the LCP most often

Document lifecycle (lab) — loadSitesPassing LCPLCP
0 1,468 71% 1.9s
12–23 185 85% 1.3s
24–50 1,402 84% 1.3s
51–107 4,522 89% 1.1s
108–230 17,855 92% 1.1s
231–494 44,714 92% 1.2s
495–1061 52,586 88% 1.5s
1062–2281 36,689 74% 1.9s
2282–4903 16,644 57% 2.3s
4904–10541 5,404 59% 2.2s
>p98 3,673 74% 1.7s
Good Needs Improvement Poor Faded rows: under 100 sites

Document lifecycle (lab) — load 676ms. p75 1.4s. p99 24.1s. Spearman with LCP r = +0.39. At the low end (0ms): LCP 1.9s. At the high end (>p98): LCP 1.7s. computed

The State of Web Vitals · Q2 2026 · 189,915 sites · all devices field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
8

Why this matters for the Core Web Vitals, and where to start fixing it

The document lifecycle is the old way of measuring pages, and it still says useful things. DOM interactive marks the HTML fully parsed. DOM complete waits for the subresources. The load event is the official end of loading, and everything that listens for it (analytics, widgets, third-party tags) starts there.

A long gap between interactive and complete means resource weight, not markup. These milestones do not map onto user experience the way the vitals do, which is why they were replaced. But a page with a slow lifecycle does not produce fast vitals.

How does this affect the Core Web Vitals?

Passing LCP barely moves across the range: 68% at one end, 64% at the other. This signal does not separate passing sites from failing ones.

Related signals Total Blocking Time (lab) → Main-thread CPU (lab) → Lab paint timeline → Chrome field data from 189,915 sites, representing millions of real page loads · How we measured