CDN performance

Performance breakdown by cdn.

Field data PhoneDesktopAll Scope All sites Q1 2026 edition · All devices field outcomes
Metric LCP INP CLS
1

At a glance the headline numbers for CDN performance

Performance breakdown by cdn.

7
Items ranked
After min-sites filter
94,906
Sites in sample
Combined across all items
578ms
Best TTFB (p75)
Vercel
The State of Web Vitals · Q1 2026 · 94,910 sites · all devices field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
2

The ranking sorted by TTFB at p75, fastest first

# Item TTFB p75 Passing Sites
1 Vercel 578ms 88.7%
538
2 Fastly 871ms 72.2%
3,357
3 Cloudflare 951ms 69.2%
12,431
4 CloudFront 1.1s 62.6%
3,241
5 Netlify 1.1s 47.1%
175
6 Akamai 1.1s 59.5%
2,663
7 No CDN (origin) 1.2s 56.0%
72,501
The State of Web Vitals · Q1 2026 · 94,910 sites · all devices field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
3

Passing TTFB per item which group passes the TTFB most often

ItemSitesPassing TTFBp75
Vercel 0.6% 538 89% 578ms
Fastly 3.5% 3,357 72% 871ms
Cloudflare 13.1% 12,431 69% 951ms
CloudFront 3.4% 3,241 63% 1.1s
Akamai 2.8% 2,663 60% 1.1s
No CDN (origin) 76.4% 72,501 56% 1.2s
Netlify 0.2% 175 47% 1.1s
Good Needs Improvement Poor Sorted best-passing first · median colored by its own rating · pass = good TTFB (800ms at p75) · one value per site

89% of Vercel sites pass TTFB. Netlify trails 42 points behind, leaving 53% of its sites failing. computed

The State of Web Vitals · Q1 2026 · 94,910 sites · all devices field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
4

All five vitals at once the whole category without toggling - cell is the pass rate, small number the p75

LCP
INP
CLS
FCP
TTFB
No CDN (origin) 76.4%
822.2s
95106ms
880.03
761.8s
561.2s
Cloudflare 13.1%
862.0s
94116ms
880.04
821.5s
69951ms
Fastly 3.5%
862.0s
94103ms
890.02
831.5s
72871ms
CloudFront 3.4%
812.3s
91135ms
780.09
781.7s
631.1s
Akamai 2.8%
832.1s
97109ms
870.04
791.7s
601.1s
Vercel 0.6%
832.2s
90153ms
840.05
791.7s
89578ms
Netlify 0.2%
742.5s
79177ms
710.15
751.8s
471.1s
60%95%+ passing Cell: pass rate, small number = p75 · faded rows: under 100 sites

One row per item, one column per vital - the cell is the share of sites passing, the small number the p75. No toggling needed to see where the category actually differs.

Vercel leads on TTFB: 89% of its sites pass. Netlify trails at 47%. computed

The State of Web Vitals · Q1 2026 · 94,910 sites · all devices field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
5

Why this matters for the Core Web Vitals, and where to start fixing it

A CDN sits between your server and your visitors, serving content from a location near each of them instead of from a single origin. That shortens the trip every request makes, which shows up first in Time to First Byte and then in how quickly the main content can paint. A good CDN also handles caching, compression and modern protocols, so the gains reach well beyond raw distance.

Start by making sure the CDN is actually caching your pages and assets rather than passing everything through to the origin. Turn on compression and HTTP/2 or HTTP/3, set sensible cache headers, and check that your largest image is served from the edge. A CDN that passes every request through to the origin gives you almost none of this.

How does your CDN affect Core Web Vitals?

Among the most-used CDNs, Vercel reaches a good TTFB on 88.7% of sites; No CDN (origin) on 56.0%.

Related signals CMS (10) → Frameworks (11) → Chrome field data from 94,910 sites, representing millions of real page loads · How we measured