CDN performance

Performance breakdown by cdn.

Field data PhoneDesktopAll Scope All sites Q2 2026 edition · Desktop field outcomes
Metric TTFB LCP INP CLS FCP
1

At a glance the headline numbers for CDN performance

Performance breakdown by cdn.

89.9%
Best: Vercel
good FCP
85.2%
Typical CDN
good FCP
81.5%
Worst: No CDN (origin)
good FCP

Vercel passes FCP most often of any CDN. 89.9% of its sites pass. No CDN (origin) (the most-used CDN) passes least at 81.5%. The gap is 8 percentage points.

The State of Web Vitals · Q2 2026 · 189,915 sites · desktop field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
2

The ranking sorted by FCP at p75, fastest first

# CDN FCP p75 Passing Sites
1 Vercel 1.3s 89.9%
980
2 Fastly 1.4s 85.8%
6,437
3 Netlify 1.4s 86.9%
343
4 Cloudflare 1.4s 84.5%
23,785
5 Akamai 1.4s 85.2%
4,955
6 No CDN (origin) 1.6s 81.5%
142,621
7 CloudFront 1.6s 81.4%
6,141
The State of Web Vitals · Q2 2026 · 189,915 sites · desktop field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
3

Passing FCP per CDN which group passes the FCP most often

CDNSitesPassing FCPp75
Vercel 0.5% 980 90% 1.3s
Netlify 0.2% 343 87% 1.4s
Fastly 3.4% 6,437 86% 1.4s
Akamai 2.6% 4,955 85% 1.4s
Cloudflare 12.5% 23,785 85% 1.4s
No CDN (origin) 75.1% 142,621 82% 1.6s
CloudFront 3.2% 6,141 81% 1.6s
Good Needs Improvement Poor Sorted best-passing first · median colored by its own rating · pass = good FCP (1.8s at p75) · one value per site

90% of Vercel sites pass FCP. CloudFront trails 9 points behind. computed

The State of Web Vitals · Q2 2026 · 189,915 sites · desktop field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
4

All five vitals at once the whole category without toggling - cell is the pass rate, small number the p75

LCP
INP
CLS
FCP
TTFB
No CDN (origin) 75.1%
862.0s
9963ms
780.09
821.6s
621.1s
Cloudflare 12.5%
881.9s
9971ms
800.08
851.4s
68972ms
Fastly 3.4%
871.9s
9864ms
790.09
861.4s
621.1s
CloudFront 3.2%
842.1s
9781ms
720.12
811.6s
641.1s
Akamai 2.6%
891.9s
9963ms
800.08
851.4s
651.0s
Vercel 0.5%
901.9s
9990ms
800.08
901.3s
90429ms
Netlify 0.2%
782.4s
90105ms
780.08
871.4s
84712ms
60%95%+ passing Cell: pass rate, small number = p75 · faded rows: under 100 sites

One row per CDN, one column per vital - the cell is the share of sites passing, the small number the p75. No toggling needed to see where the category actually differs.

Vercel leads on FCP: 90% of its sites pass. CloudFront trails at 81%. computed

The State of Web Vitals · Q2 2026 · 189,915 sites · desktop field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
5

Why this matters for the Core Web Vitals, and where to start fixing it

A CDN sits between your server and your visitors, serving content from a location near each of them instead of from a single origin. That shortens the trip every request makes, which shows up first in Time to First Byte and then in how quickly the main content can paint. A good CDN also handles caching, compression and modern protocols, so the gains reach well beyond raw distance.

Start by making sure the CDN is actually caching your pages and assets rather than passing everything through to the origin. Turn on compression and HTTP/2 or HTTP/3, set sensible cache headers, and check that your largest image is served from the edge. A CDN that passes every request through to the origin gives you almost none of this.

How does your CDN affect Core Web Vitals?

Among the most-used CDNs, Vercel reaches a good FCP on 89.9% of sites; CloudFront on 81.4%.

Related signals CMS (11) → Frameworks (11) → Chrome field data from 189,915 sites, representing millions of real page loads · How we measured