At a glance the headline numbers for CDN performance
Performance breakdown by cdn.
The ranking sorted by INP at p75, fastest first
| # | Item | INP p75 | Passing | Sites | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No CDN (origin) | 63ms | 99.0% | 72,501 | |
| 2 | Akamai | 63ms | 99.4% | 2,663 | |
| 3 | Fastly | 66ms | 98.1% | 3,357 | |
| 4 | Cloudflare | 71ms | 98.8% | 12,431 | |
| 5 | CloudFront | 82ms | 96.8% | 3,241 | |
| 6 | Vercel | 90ms | 98.9% | 538 | |
| 7 | Netlify | 128ms | 83.8% | 175 |
Passing INP per item which group passes the INP most often
99% of Akamai sites pass INP. Netlify trails 15 points behind. computed
All five vitals at once the whole category without toggling - cell is the pass rate, small number the p75
One row per item, one column per vital - the cell is the share of sites passing, the small number the p75. No toggling needed to see where the category actually differs.
No CDN (origin) leads on INP: 99% of its sites pass. Netlify trails at 84%. computed
Why this matters for the Core Web Vitals, and where to start fixing it
A CDN sits between your server and your visitors, serving content from a location near each of them instead of from a single origin. That shortens the trip every request makes, which shows up first in Time to First Byte and then in how quickly the main content can paint. A good CDN also handles caching, compression and modern protocols, so the gains reach well beyond raw distance.
Start by making sure the CDN is actually caching your pages and assets rather than passing everything through to the origin. Turn on compression and HTTP/2 or HTTP/3, set sensible cache headers, and check that your largest image is served from the edge. A CDN that passes every request through to the origin gives you almost none of this.
How does your CDN affect Core Web Vitals?
Among the most-used CDNs, No CDN (origin) reaches a good INP on 99.0% of sites; Netlify on 83.8%.
Chrome field data from 94,910 sites, representing millions of real page loads. How we measured.