CDN performance

Performance breakdown by cdn.

Field data PhoneDesktopAll Scope All sites Q2 2026 edition · Desktop field outcomes
Metric TTFB LCP INP CLS FCP
1

At a glance the headline numbers for CDN performance

Performance breakdown by cdn.

99.0%
Best: No CDN (origin)
good INP
98.5%
Typical CDN
good INP
90.0%
Worst: Netlify
good INP

No CDN (origin) passes INP most often of any CDN. 99.0% of its sites pass. Netlify passes least at 90.0%. The gap is 9 percentage points.

The State of Web Vitals · Q2 2026 · 189,915 sites · desktop field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
2

The ranking sorted by INP at p75, fastest first

# CDN INP p75 Passing Sites
1 No CDN (origin) 63ms 99.0%
142,621
2 Akamai 63ms 99.2%
4,955
3 Fastly 64ms 98.3%
6,437
4 Cloudflare 71ms 98.8%
23,785
5 CloudFront 81ms 97.4%
6,141
6 Vercel 90ms 98.5%
980
7 Netlify 105ms 90.0%
343
The State of Web Vitals · Q2 2026 · 189,915 sites · desktop field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
3

Passing INP per CDN which group passes the INP most often

CDNSitesPassing INPp75
Akamai 2.6% 4,955 99% 63ms
No CDN (origin) 75.1% 142,621 99% 63ms
Cloudflare 12.5% 23,785 99% 71ms
Vercel 0.5% 980 99% 90ms
Fastly 3.4% 6,437 98% 64ms
CloudFront 3.2% 6,141 97% 81ms
Netlify 0.2% 343 90% 105ms
Good Needs Improvement Poor Sorted best-passing first · median colored by its own rating · pass = good INP (200ms at p75) · one value per site

99% of Akamai sites pass INP. Netlify trails 9 points behind. computed

The State of Web Vitals · Q2 2026 · 189,915 sites · desktop field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
4

All five vitals at once the whole category without toggling - cell is the pass rate, small number the p75

LCP
INP
CLS
FCP
TTFB
No CDN (origin) 75.1%
862.0s
9963ms
780.09
821.6s
621.1s
Cloudflare 12.5%
881.9s
9971ms
800.08
851.4s
68972ms
Fastly 3.4%
871.9s
9864ms
790.09
861.4s
621.1s
CloudFront 3.2%
842.1s
9781ms
720.12
811.6s
641.1s
Akamai 2.6%
891.9s
9963ms
800.08
851.4s
651.0s
Vercel 0.5%
901.9s
9990ms
800.08
901.3s
90429ms
Netlify 0.2%
782.4s
90105ms
780.08
871.4s
84712ms
60%95%+ passing Cell: pass rate, small number = p75 · faded rows: under 100 sites

One row per CDN, one column per vital - the cell is the share of sites passing, the small number the p75. No toggling needed to see where the category actually differs.

No CDN (origin) leads on INP: 99% of its sites pass. Netlify trails at 90%. computed

The State of Web Vitals · Q2 2026 · 189,915 sites · desktop field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
5

Why this matters for the Core Web Vitals, and where to start fixing it

A CDN sits between your server and your visitors, serving content from a location near each of them instead of from a single origin. That shortens the trip every request makes, which shows up first in Time to First Byte and then in how quickly the main content can paint. A good CDN also handles caching, compression and modern protocols, so the gains reach well beyond raw distance.

Start by making sure the CDN is actually caching your pages and assets rather than passing everything through to the origin. Turn on compression and HTTP/2 or HTTP/3, set sensible cache headers, and check that your largest image is served from the edge. A CDN that passes every request through to the origin gives you almost none of this.

How does your CDN affect Core Web Vitals?

Among the most-used CDNs, No CDN (origin) reaches a good INP on 99.0% of sites; Netlify on 90.0%.

Related signals CMS (11) → Frameworks (11) → Chrome field data from 189,915 sites, representing millions of real page loads · How we measured