Analytics impact

Sites running each analytics provider, ranked by their CWV.

Field data PhoneDesktopAll Scope All sites Q2 2026 edition · All devices field outcomes
Metric LCP INP CLS
1

At a glance the headline numbers for Analytics impact

Sites running each analytics provider, ranked by their CWV.

19
Providers ranked
After min-sites filter
190,113
Sites in sample
Combined across all items
1.5s
Best LCP (p75)
GoatCounter
The State of Web Vitals · Q2 2026 · 189,915 sites · all devices field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
2

The ranking sorted by LCP at p75, fastest first

# Provider LCP p75 Passing Sites
1 GoatCounter 1.5s 96.0%
56
2 Clicky 1.6s 91.1%
225
3 Plausible 1.6s 92.2%
2,010
4 Snowplow 1.8s 87.8%
3,006
5 Chartbeat 1.9s 94.6%
75
6 Pirsch 2.0s 90.4%
113
7 Fathom 2.0s 84.1%
315
8 Matomo 2.0s 85.4%
12,391
9 Umami 2.1s 82.1%
826
10 AT Internet/Piano 2.1s 83.9%
527
11 StatCounter 2.2s 81.9%
308
12 Simple Analytics 2.2s 78.4%
91
13 Amplitude 2.2s 81.1%
169
14 Google Analytics 4 2.3s 80.6%
96,650
15 Universal Analytics 2.3s 80.0%
72,426
16 PostHog 2.4s 78.6%
295
17 Mixpanel 2.5s 74.8%
117
18 Adobe Analytics 2.6s 73.0%
440
19 Heap 3.0s 60.6%
73
The State of Web Vitals · Q2 2026 · 189,915 sites · all devices field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
3

Passing LCP per provider which group passes the LCP most often

ProviderSitesPassing LCPp75
Parsely 0% 36 97% 1.9s
GoatCounter 0% 56 96% 1.5s
Chartbeat 0% 75 95% 1.9s
Plausible 1.1% 2,010 92% 1.6s
Clicky 0.1% 225 91% 1.6s
Pirsch 0.1% 113 90% 2.0s
Snowplow 1.6% 3,006 88% 1.8s
Matomo 6.5% 12,391 85% 2.0s
Fathom 0.2% 315 84% 2.0s
AT Internet/Piano 0.3% 527 84% 2.1s
Umami 0.4% 826 82% 2.1s
StatCounter 0.2% 308 82% 2.2s
Amplitude 0.1% 169 81% 2.2s
Google Analytics 4 50.9% 96,650 81% 2.3s
Universal Analytics 38.1% 72,426 80% 2.3s
PostHog 0.2% 295 79% 2.4s
Simple Analytics 0% 91 78% 2.2s
Mixpanel 0.1% 117 75% 2.5s
Adobe Analytics 0.2% 440 73% 2.6s
Heap 0% 73 61% 3.0s
Good Needs Improvement Poor Sorted best-passing first · median colored by its own rating · pass = good LCP (2.5s at p75) · one value per site

92% of Plausible sites pass LCP. Adobe Analytics trails 19 points behind, leaving 27% of its sites failing. computed

The State of Web Vitals · Q2 2026 · 189,915 sites · all devices field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
4

All five vitals at once the whole category without toggling - cell is the pass rate, small number the p75

LCP
INP
CLS
FCP
TTFB
Google Analytics 4 50.9%
812.3s
95114ms
860.05
741.8s
551.3s
Universal Analytics 38.1%
802.3s
95113ms
870.05
731.9s
541.3s
Matomo 6.5%
852.0s
96118ms
880.04
791.7s
611.1s
Snowplow 1.6%
881.8s
96101ms
880.03
861.4s
75799ms
Plausible 1.1%
921.6s
9796ms
910.02
901.3s
81699ms
Umami 0.4%
822.1s
93120ms
890.02
811.6s
75805ms
AT Internet/Piano 0.3%
842.1s
93122ms
830.08
831.6s
69883ms
Adobe Analytics 0.2%
732.6s
83178ms
610.21
741.8s
65977ms
Fathom 0.2%
842.0s
98114ms
870.04
791.6s
641.0s
StatCounter 0.2%
822.2s
93111ms
880.04
771.7s
571.2s
PostHog 0.2%
792.4s
87149ms
860.06
691.9s
461.3s
Clicky 0.1%
911.6s
9995ms
810.08
851.3s
74831ms
Amplitude 0.1%
812.2s
84170ms
820.08
811.6s
72839ms
Mixpanel 0.1%
752.5s
90130ms
720.12
771.6s
68912ms
Pirsch 0.1%
902.0s
97120ms
740.14
961.5s
57916ms
Simple Analytics 0%
782.2s
95109ms
840.03
751.8s
611.1s
Chartbeat 0%
951.9s
79174ms
680.11
931.5s
77763ms
Heap 0%
613.0s
81187ms
720.12
652.3s
551.2s
GoatCounter 0%
961.5s
100102ms
880.03
961.3s
88553ms
Parsely 0%
971.9s
77193ms
310.19
831.7s
69898ms
60%95%+ passing Cell: pass rate, small number = p75 · faded rows: under 100 sites

One row per provider, one column per vital - the cell is the share of sites passing, the small number the p75. No toggling needed to see where the category actually differs.

Plausible leads on LCP: 92% of its sites pass. Adobe Analytics trails at 73%. computed

The State of Web Vitals · Q2 2026 · 189,915 sites · all devices field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
Related signals Marketing pixels (10) → Session recording (11) → Ad networks (9) → Reviews (8) → Chrome field data from 189,915 sites, representing millions of real page loads · How we measured