Third-party domains

How many distinct third-party domains the page contacts.

Field data PhoneDesktopAll Scope All sites Q2 2026 edition · Desktop field outcomes
Metric LCP INP CLS
1

At a glance the headline numbers for Third-party domains

How many distinct third-party domains the page contacts.

7
on the typical site
half of sites sit at or below
11
1 in 4 sites exceed this
the top quarter
35
the heaviest 1%
the long tail
185,271
sites measured
desktop field data

The typical site contacts 7 third-party domains. The heaviest 1% contact 35 or more.

The State of Web Vitals · Q2 2026 · 189,915 sites · desktop field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
2

Distribution & median INP site count and median INP at each level of third-party domains

0ms 63ms 125ms 188ms 250ms
200ms
0 19193 38385
0 1 2 3 4 5 6–8 9–11 12–15 16–21 22–29 >p98
Good (≤200ms) Needs improvement Poor (>500ms) Site count
The State of Web Vitals · Q2 2026 · 189,915 sites · desktop field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
3

Passing INP by third-party domains which level passes the INP most often

Third-party domainsSitesPassing INPINP
1 14,713 99% 43ms
2 18,836 99% 45ms
3 14,620 99% 45ms
4 14,491 99% 45ms
5 13,597 99% 45ms
6–8 38,385 99% 47ms
9–11 28,572 99% 48ms
12–15 20,596 99% 51ms
16–21 12,368 99% 57ms
22–29 5,573 99% 62ms
>p98 3,515 98% 74ms
Good Needs Improvement Poor Faded rows: under 100 sites

Third-party domains 7. p75 11. p99 35. At the low end (1): INP 43ms. At the high end (>p98): INP 74ms. computed

The State of Web Vitals · Q2 2026 · 189,915 sites · desktop field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
4

Why this matters for the Core Web Vitals, and where to start fixing it

Third-party domains are a common Core Web Vitals issue. First of all, each third-party domain needs a new connection. That means time is lost on a DNS lookup, a TCP handshake and a TLS negotiation. If you had served those resources from your main domain, the browser could have re-used the connection that is already open (that is why you want HTTP/3: one fast, re-usable connection for everything you control). When that domain serves a font or a stylesheet, the browser cannot render before the connection is ready. The connection setup delays the LCP.

Also, third-party resources are usually out of your control. They can become a SPOF (single point of failure) when their server is slow or down. They can also change in size or behaviour without your knowledge, and your Core Web Vitals change with them. Self-hosting fixes both problems at once. Preconnect only hides part of the connection cost.

How do third-party domains affect the Core Web Vitals?

Passing LCP barely moves across the range: 88% at one end, 86% at the other. This signal does not separate passing sites from failing ones.

The effect is bigger on CLS. With a single third-party domain, 85% of sites pass it. Among the sites with the most third parties, 73% do. Third parties inject ads, embeds and consent banners, and injected content moves the layout after the page looks done.

Related signals Responsive image markup → Stylesheet loading mix → Image format mix → Images per page → Chrome field data from 189,915 sites, representing millions of real page loads · How we measured