Page weight & requests

Every request the page makes on a cold load: request count and total transfer size over the wire.

Field data PhoneDesktopAll Scope All sites Q2 2026 edition · Desktop field outcomes
Metric LCP INP CLS
1

At a glance the headline numbers for Page weight & requests

Every request the page makes on a cold load: request count and total transfer size over the wire.

71
request count
on the typical page
2.3 MB
page weight
on the typical page
4.5 MB
1 in 4 pages exceed this
page weight
185,271
sites measured
desktop field data

The typical page weighs 2.3 MB across 71 requests.

The State of Web Vitals · Q2 2026 · 189,915 sites · desktop field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
2

Distribution & median INP site count and median INP at each level of page weight & requests — n

0ms 63ms 125ms 188ms 250ms
200ms
0 26495 52990
0 1–2 3 4–6 7–11 12–19 20–35 36–62 63–112 113–203 204–366 >p98
Good (≤200ms) Needs improvement Poor (>500ms) Site count
The State of Web Vitals · Q2 2026 · 189,915 sites · desktop field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
3

Passing INP by page weight & requests — n which level passes the INP most often

Page weight & requests — nSitesPassing INPINP
1–2 2,280 98% 45ms
3 1,692 98% 48ms
4–6 4,413 99% 47ms
7–11 2,565 99% 45ms
12–19 6,527 99% 46ms
20–35 21,342 99% 45ms
36–62 42,096 99% 45ms
63–112 52,990 99% 48ms
113–203 34,303 99% 53ms
204–366 13,375 99% 57ms
>p98 3,683 99% 68ms
Good Needs Improvement Poor Faded rows: under 100 sites

Page weight & requests — n 71. p75 120. p99 439. At the low end (1–2): INP 45ms. At the high end (>p98): INP 68ms. computed

The State of Web Vitals · Q2 2026 · 189,915 sites · desktop field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
4

Distribution & median INP site count and median INP at each level of page weight & requests — size

0ms 63ms 125ms 188ms 250ms
200ms
0 40094 80188
0 0.1–0.346 0.346–1.2 1.2–4.14 4.14–14.3 14.3–49.6 49.6–172 172–593 593–2053 2053–7104 7104–24579 >p98
Good (≤200ms) Needs improvement Poor (>500ms) Site count
The State of Web Vitals · Q2 2026 · 189,915 sites · desktop field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
5

Passing INP by page weight & requests — size which level passes the INP most often

Page weight & requests — sizeSitesPassing INPINP
0 9,187 98% 47ms
0.1–0.346 362 99% 45ms
0.346–1.2 869 99% 44ms
1.2–4.14 737 98% 46ms
4.14–14.3 602 98% 47ms
14.3–49.6 1,041 98% 47ms
49.6–172 2,101 98% 44ms
172–593 10,655 99% 44ms
593–2053 57,127 99% 46ms
2053–7104 80,188 99% 51ms
7104–24579 23,431 99% 53ms
>p98 3,615 99% 54ms
Good Needs Improvement Poor Faded rows: under 100 sites

Page weight & requests — size 2.3 MB. p75 4.5 MB. p99 33.3 MB. At the low end (0 KB): INP 47ms. At the high end (>p98): INP 54ms. computed

The State of Web Vitals · Q2 2026 · 189,915 sites · desktop field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
6

Why this matters for the Core Web Vitals, and where to start fixing it

Page weight is a bandwidth problem. The network can only move so many bytes per second and every resource on the page competes for that capacity. The LCP image does not load alone. It shares bandwidth with every script, stylesheet and tracking pixel that loads at the same time. A heavier page means the main content arrives later.

Request count matters next to the bytes. Every request adds queueing and scheduling overhead. On a busy connection important requests wait behind unimportant ones. Script bytes keep costing after the download. The main thread has to parse and execute them, and that delays interactions (INP). The resource type breakdown shows where the bytes sit.

How does page weight affect the Core Web Vitals?

Passing LCP barely moves across the range: 86% at one end, 83% at the other. This signal does not separate passing sites from failing ones.

Related signals Cookies per site → Stylesheet initiator → Script coverage (used vs unused) → font-display strategy → Chrome field data from 189,915 sites, representing millions of real page loads · How we measured