Email marketing impact

Performance impact by email_marketing provider.

Field data PhoneDesktopAll Scope All sites Q2 2026 edition · All devices field outcomes
Metric LCP INP CLS
1

At a glance the headline numbers for Email marketing impact

Performance impact by email_marketing provider.

5
Providers ranked
After min-sites filter
9,766
Sites in sample
Combined across all items
104ms
Best INP (p75)
Mailchimp
The State of Web Vitals · Q2 2026 · 189,915 sites · all devices field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
2

The ranking sorted by INP at p75, fastest first

# Provider INP p75 Passing Sites
1 Mailchimp 104ms 97.9%
3,276
2 HubSpot 110ms 97.2%
3,075
3 ActiveCampaign 119ms 96.3%
438
4 Klaviyo 145ms 92.9%
2,914
5 Salesforce Marketing Cloud 202ms 74.2%
63
The State of Web Vitals · Q2 2026 · 189,915 sites · all devices field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
3

Passing INP per provider which group passes the INP most often

ProviderSitesPassing INPp75
Mailchimp 1.7% 3,276 98% 104ms
Marketo 0% 40 97% 114ms
HubSpot 1.6% 3,075 97% 110ms
ActiveCampaign 0.2% 438 96% 119ms
Klaviyo 1.5% 2,914 93% 145ms
Iterable 0% 8 88% 157ms
Braze 0% 20 85% 184ms
Salesforce Marketing Cloud 0% 63 74% 202ms
Good Needs Improvement Poor Sorted best-passing first · median colored by its own rating · pass = good INP (200ms at p75) · one value per site

98% of Mailchimp sites pass INP. Klaviyo trails 5 points behind. computed

The State of Web Vitals · Q2 2026 · 189,915 sites · all devices field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
4

All five vitals at once the whole category without toggling - cell is the pass rate, small number the p75

LCP
INP
CLS
FCP
TTFB
Mailchimp 1.7%
772.4s
98104ms
870.04
702.0s
491.5s
HubSpot 1.6%
792.3s
97110ms
840.06
731.9s
541.3s
Klaviyo 1.5%
882.0s
93145ms
890.04
861.4s
81691ms
ActiveCampaign 0.2%
702.7s
96119ms
850.06
632.2s
401.7s
Salesforce Marketing Cloud 0%
752.5s
74202ms
780.10
642.1s
371.5s
Marketo 0%
802.4s
97114ms
680.11
751.8s
551.2s
Braze 0%
652.7s
85184ms
900.07
452.2s
301.5s
Iterable 0%
881.6s
88157ms
630.34
881.3s
88683ms
60%95%+ passing Cell: pass rate, small number = p75 · faded rows: under 100 sites

One row per provider, one column per vital - the cell is the share of sites passing, the small number the p75. No toggling needed to see where the category actually differs.

Mailchimp leads on INP: 98% of its sites pass. Klaviyo trails at 93%. computed

The State of Web Vitals · Q2 2026 · 189,915 sites · all devices field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
Related signals Font services (4) → Session recording (11) → Search (5) → Performance services (8) → Chrome field data from 189,915 sites, representing millions of real page loads · How we measured